How to Run a Collaborative Review on an HTML Page
Set a review goal, collect anchored comments, resolve conflicts, and publish a clear final version.
The short version
A review should reduce uncertainty, not simply increase the number of comments.
Frame the review before sharing
Tell reviewers what stage the page is in and what kind of feedback is useful. A content review, visual polish pass, accessibility audit, and final approval are different jobs. Combining them creates contradictory comments.
Keep feedback attached to the work
- Comment on the exact paragraph, component, or table cell.
- Describe the reader problem before proposing a solution.
- Use threads for clarification instead of duplicating comments.
- Assign an owner when a change requires a decision.
- Resolve only after the revision is visible.
Publish revisions in visible rounds
Summarize what changed and preserve a version before each major round. Reviewers can then compare the current page with the prior decision point without hunting through attachments.
When an agent is doing the revision, feed it the anchored comments and the current HTML together. The context is more precise than a prose summary written after the fact.